ROININJA powered by

Don't build a team.
Rent ours.

Full-service marketing for education launching a new programme, a new campus or a new market - universities, private K-12, vocational and trade, language schools and online degrees. Validation, the prospectus, the website and the ad account each have their own timeline, and only the intake date is real. You get one team working to that date instead of six vendors working to their own.

Six vendors, one deadline, and the deadline was set three years ago.

Plan my launch → See the cases
Positioning & Programme Story Paid & Student Creators Open Days, Community & PR Enrolment Tracking & CRM
72h
to first creatives live
12+
specialists on your launch
300+
specialists on call
Verticals

New intakes, end to end

Playbooks per regulated category - angles, funnels and compliance patterns ready before your kickoff, not figured out on your budget.

5 education niches more coming
🎓
Universities
Undergraduate and postgraduate intake against dates that do not move. A graduate place costs the sector around $3,804 to fill, and the committee approving the creative will debate the brand until the deadline passes.
See the case →
🏫
Private K-12
The buyer is a parent choosing for a decade, not a term. Visits and sibling entry carry most of the yield, and one thin year of intake reshapes a whole cohort.
See the case →
🔧
Vocational & trade
Short courses, rolling starts and funding rules. Employability is the entire pitch, and the real competitor is the job the learner could take tomorrow.
See the case →
🗣
Language schools
Seasonal, international and priced by the week. Agents and aggregators sit between you and the student, and they keep the relationship you paid for.
See the case →
💻
Online degrees
Always-on intakes and roughly $140 to buy one enquiry. Volume is the easy part, and enquiry to enrolled is where the money actually goes.
See the case →
What you get

The whole launch stack - one roof

Everything a launch needs, working in parallel from day one. No vendor juggling, no handoffs, no "waiting on assets".

6 functions, one team one invoice
Strategy & Positioning
Who the programme is for, what it replaces in their life and the one reason to pick it over the institution down the road - agreed in a day-1 workshop with the faculty in the room, because a positioning line the admissions team cannot repeat costs you the entire cycle.
How we run it →
Creative Production
Course films, student and tutor pieces, the visit invitation and the offer-holder sequence - first batch in 72h, shot once so the same footage serves the ad, the course page and the prospectus instead of being reshot three times by three suppliers.
How we run it →
Paid Acquisition
Meta, Google Search and Demand Gen, YouTube, TikTok and paid course-directory placement, with the spend curve built around the intake calendar rather than divided by twelve.
How we run it →
KOL & Influencer
Current students, recent alumni and subject creators your applicants already watch, briefed to answer the questions the prospectus avoids - workload, cost of living, and what happens if you fail a module.
How we run it →
Community & PR
Applicant and offer-holder groups that are actually moderated, open days built as bookable sessions that fill, and the local, trade and international press that reaches parents and agents rather than academics.
How we run it →
Tracking & Analytics
Ad platforms, the enquiry form, the application system and the student record joined on day 2, so an enrolment in September traces back to the ad that caused it in February.
How we run it →
Diagnosis → Cure

Recognize yourself?

If even one line is about you - it's time to change the approach.

Validation approved, the intake is nine weeks away Six vendors, nobody owns the intake number Prospectus at the printers, no course page Course code changed after everything was printed Faculty wrote the copy, applicants did not read it Agency has never seen an application cycle Open day announced to nobody in particular No students, no alumni, no proof at all Validation approved, the intake is nine weeks away Six vendors, nobody owns the intake number Prospectus at the printers, no course page Course code changed after everything was printed Faculty wrote the copy, applicants did not read it Agency has never seen an application cycle Open day announced to nobody in particular No students, no alumni, no proof at all
Website sign-off waiting on three committees Application portal nobody tested on a phone Offer holders went quiet, nobody followed up International agents signed, never briefed Press release sent to entirely the wrong press CRM configured after the first enquiries landed A rival launched the same course first First cohort too small for the module to run Website sign-off waiting on three committees Application portal nobody tested on a phone Offer holders went quiet, nobody followed up International agents signed, never briefed Press release sent to entirely the wrong press CRM configured after the first enquiries landed A rival launched the same course first First cohort too small for the module to run
how we fix it ↓
01
One accountable team
One owner, one KPI
One Slack channelOne number
Strategy, creative, paid, KOL and tracking under one roof - one person answers for the launch number.
02
Speed to live
First creatives in 72h
Day-2 trackingDay-3 ads
Launches are won on momentum. We wire tracking, ship the first batch and go live while others schedule kickoffs.
03
Vertical-native playbooks
iGaming · Crypto · Forex · Nutra · Pharma
Moderation-proofGEO-tested
We've launched in these exact verticals. Angles, funnels and compliance patterns are ready on day one - not discovered on your budget.
04
Scale after launch
From day-1 FTDs to LTV
Budget reallocationRetention
The same team scales what works after launch - paid, KOL, retention - no re-briefing a new vendor at month two.
⚡ Feel the difference

Vendor zoo vs one team

Same intake, two ways to run it. The front card is week six with a zoo of vendors and a deadline that will not move. Swipe it away to see the day-one-week status when a single team owns the enrolment number.

💤 The vendor-zoo launch

swipe right →
Stats

Why launches miss their window

The launch math is brutal: hiring is slow, vendors don't sync, and the window doesn't wait.

5 mo
to hire an in-house team
Strategist, buyer, designer, analyst - by the time they're onboarded, the window's gone.
$35k+
monthly in-house burn
Six salaries before a single ad runs - and before you know if the offer converts.
70%
of launches slip
Vendor handoffs and unowned deadlines - the classic launch killer.
72h
to first creatives live
Our kickoff-to-feed time. Momentum is the launch edge nobody can refund.
3x
faster to first revenue
One team moving in parallel vs vendors waiting on each other in a queue.
1
owner of the number
CPA, FTDs or ROI - the whole team is paid to hit it, not to ship deliverables.
Vendor zoo → handoffs, delays, blame One team → speed, ownership, revenue
How we run it

Your first two weeks with us

A launch sprint, not an onboarding quarter. Everything moves in parallel - here's the sequence.

Days 1-3 · Strategy sprint
One workshop locks positioning, offer, GEO plan and budget split. No six-week discovery - decisions, in writing, day one.
By 72h · Creative batch
Statics, video and UGC briefs ship in parallel with strategy - moderation-proof for your vertical, ready to test, not to admire.
Aa
Before ads · Tracking wired
Click-to-LTV analytics, postbacks and CRM live before the first dollar of spend - launch day runs on data, not vibes.
Week 1 · Channels go live
Paid and KOL fire together - ads, creator posts and community beats hit in one wave, not one channel at a time.
Daily · Launch war-room
One Slack channel, daily numbers, budget shifted to what converts. No weekly PDF - you see what we see.
Always · One launch lead
A strategist who owns your number end to end - and answers for every specialist on the team. No ticket queue.
Cases

Education targets, and the real cases behind them

Tap a case - we'll show the details. Figures are from live campaigns; brand names withheld under NDA. No education launch of ours is published yet, so the targets below are modelled from two live cases that share the mechanics - a budget that had to land against dates nobody could move, and a funnel paid on the conversion that carries the money rather than on the first form fill. The units are deliberately not ROAS. A first intake is measured in students who start, and a cohort that comes in under the minimum does not run at all. Full portfolio across every vertical →

Modelled targets, not delivered results. The ranges below are projections. The real campaigns they are modelled on sit underneath, with their actual verticals and figures on them.
Education: what we would target in the first 90 days
Universities · TARGET
A first intake that reaches the number to run
$30-70K/mo$1,500-3,300 per enrolled student+
Task
Fill a brand-new programme with no cohort, no outcomes and no reviews, against a deadline that was fixed before you were hired.
Modelled on $30-70K/mo · first honest read at 90 days
Target — not a delivered result
$1,500-3,300 per enrolled student
$150-230
Cost / enquiry
7-10%
Enquiry→enrolled
$1,500-3,300
Per enrolment
What we would run
  • Spend curve built backwards from the intake date rather than divided across the year
  • Enquiry, application and enrolment wired into one report on day 2, not after the cycle
  • Proof manufactured from staff, employers and partner institutions while there are no alumni yet
Private K-12 · TARGET
An opening cohort that fills the year group
$10-22K/mo$1,200-3,000 per accepted place+
Task
Open a school with no reputation in a catchment that already has three, and fill the first year group before the fit-out is paid for.
Modelled on $10-22K/mo · first honest read at 60 days
Target — not a delivered result
$1,200-3,000 per accepted place
$110-180
Cost / attended visit
6-9%
Visit→accepted place
$1,200-3,000
Per accepted place
What we would run
  • Feeder nurseries, relocation agents and parent groups approached by name in week one
  • Small bookable sessions across several dates instead of one open Saturday
  • Attended visits as the conversion event, because a registration that does not turn up is not a lead
Online degrees · TARGET
A first cohort large enough to run
$25-55K/mo$700-1,600 per enrolled student+
Task
Turn a finished platform into a cohort that reaches the minimum and then holds together past week two.
Modelled on $25-55K/mo · first honest read at 60 days
Target — not a delivered result
$700-1,600 per enrolled student
$85-145
Cost / enquiry
9-12%
Enquiry→enrolled
$700-1,600
Per enrolment
What we would run
  • Demand bought against the outcome each programme sells, never against the word online
  • Hours, total cost and completion published so unqualified applicants remove themselves
  • Applicant nurture and the first two weeks of study owned by the same team and the same report
The real campaigns these targets come from
Crypto
Investment Platform - multichannel launch
$435Kx3.14 ROI+
Task
Bring investors with a $1,000 minimum deposit. Quality over quantity. Same mechanic an admissions office runs on, with one more gate in it: enquiry, application, enrolment. Only the last one pays anybody's salary, and the platform will happily optimise to the first one forever if nobody sends it the third.
Budget: $435K · Timeline: 10 mo
Result
24,870 qualified leads
$17.5
CPL
x3.14
ROI
11.8%
CR
What we did
  • Meta + Google + YouTube integrations in one wave
  • Dedicated landing per audience segment
  • CRM lead scoring wired before spend
iGaming
Sportsbook - EU launch on matchdays
$240Kx2.95 ROI+
Task
Acquire bettors for a new sports-betting brand across tier-1 EU. Scale FTDs around big fixtures without blowing up CPA. Same constraint an intake runs into: the date is set by somebody else and the entire budget has to land against it. A week late on a matchday is a wasted week. A week late on an application deadline is a wasted year.
Budget: $240K · Timeline: 8 mo
Result
11,280 FTD
$22.8
CPA
x2.95
ROI
31.2%
Ret D7
What we did
  • Launch timed to fixtures: odds-boost & risk-free angles
  • Fast sign-up PWA + deposit funnel
  • Streamer sessions and matchday pushes in parallel
Want this for your launch?
Let's talk →
Straight answers

The questions you're actually asking

How fast can we actually launch? +
First creatives are live within 72 hours of kickoff; the full stack - tracking, funnel, paid, KOL, community - is typically running inside two weeks. Heavier builds (PWA, PR embargoes, exchange timelines) get scheduled in the launch plan so nothing blocks the first wave.
Do we still need to hire in-house? +
Not for the launch. We cover strategy, creative, paid, KOL, community, PR and analytics - you keep product, payments and support. Later, we either keep running growth or help you hand it to an in-house team without losing the playbook.
What does this replace? +
Roughly six hires or three agencies: strategist, designer, media buyer, KOL manager, community manager, analyst. One retainer instead - and it scales up or down with the launch phase, which a headcount never does.
Do you actually work in regulated categories? +
Education is not a restricted category and a launch buyer deserves that stated plainly rather than dressed up. Every platform will run you from day one. What makes this launch hard is that the deadline belongs to somebody else. An intake date is fixed years in advance, applicants decide months before it, and a campaign that goes live six weeks late has not lost six weeks, it has lost the cycle. Around that sit the things a first intake has none of: no students to film, no alumni outcomes to publish, no reviews, and a committee that will debate the photography until the window closes. That is the argument for one team rather than six vendors, because the handoffs are where the weeks go. Our published cases are in other verticals and we will not pretend otherwise. What transfers is a launch built backwards from a date that could not be moved, and a funnel bought on the conversion that carries the money instead of the first form fill. On the call we will tell you which parts of your intake we would run first and which we would treat as a test.
How is pricing structured? +
One retainer that scales with the launch phase: heavier through the sprint, lighter once you're live and stable. You always know what next month costs - no six invoices from six vendors.
What do we need to bring? +
Product access, payment rails and whatever brand assets exist - even if that's just a logo. Strategy, creative, channels, tracking and the team are on us. The kickoff checklist takes about an hour of your time.
Can you work with our existing team or agency? +
Yes. If your media buyer or designer is strong, we build around them and fill the gaps. The only non-negotiable: one launch plan, one owner of the number - that stays with us.
What happens after the launch? +
Your call: we keep running growth on the same team, or we hand everything off - playbooks, accounts, creatives, dashboards - to your in-house hires without losing what worked.
Contact

Let's plan your launch

Free launch plan: channels, budget split, timeline and the first two weeks - before you commit to anything.

Free launch plan

We'll map your first two weeks and where the budget should go.

✓
Got it - launch plan on the way.
Pavel will reach out within 24h.